- Northwest Schools Win ‘Quality’ Grants [Capital City, Cesar Chavez, and DC Prep PCS are mentioned]
- Kwame Brown’s Education Record: A Voice for Important Ideas During Brief Stay
- Simmons: D.C.’s Incentive for Teachers to Live in City is a Good Idea
Northwest Schools Win ‘Quality’ Grants [Capital City, Cesar Chavez, and DC Prep PCS are mentioned]
The Northwest Current
By Staff
June 5, 2012
Three public schools in the Columbia Heights and Petworth areas are among four schools citywide selected by a D.C. nonprofit that provides grant money to schools with successful innovations, according to a news release from the Fight for Children group. Capital City Public Charter School’s upper school and Cesar Chavez Public Charter School’s Bruce Prep Campus each won $50,000 Champion of Quality awards this spring, and Powell Elementary School received $25,000 as a “Rising Star,” the release states.
The Quality Schools Initiative is designed to recognize best practices and provide funding for them to be promoted elsewhere in the city, according to the release. The fourth grant recipient was DC Prep’s Edgewood Elementary Campus in Ward 5.
The Washington Post
By Bill Turque
June 7, 2012
Kwame Brown’s D.C. Council chairmanship will be remembered for how it ended — in Wednesday night’s resignation, after the government charged him with bank fraud.
But in his brief stay, Brown led some important discussions about school reform. As an active DCPS parent, he came to the job with unusual empathy for others trying to maneuver through the system to get a decent education for their kids.
Brown understood that middle schools were the city’s real “drop-out factories,” the places where many students formed their decisions to quit. While modest in scope, his $1.7 million omnibus education bill planted some valuable seeds, including a pilot early warning system to identify and support middle schoolers at risk of dropping out. The bill called for another pilot to test the effectiveness of financial incentives as a way of attracting high-performing teachers to struggling schools — a critical problem for school systems. Brown also led the creation of a task force that will study neighborhood admissions preferences for charter schools so that more families might benefit from having a good school in their community.
Brown was a voice of continuity after Michelle Rhee’s resignation, a time when there was speculation that Mayor Vincent C. Gray might attempt to roll back her agenda. He was supportive of Rhee’s successor, Kaya Henderson, and established a more functional and collaborative relationship with her than Gray had with Rhee on his watch as chairman.
Brown got push-back from school officials who regarded him as a lightweight or who didn’t welcome his involvement in areas they felt they had covered. And it remains to be seen whether his initiatives will survive to be taken to scale. But some of those who worked most closely with him admired his energy and vision.
“It’s been an honor to work for Kwame Brown,” his education adviser, Lisa Raymond, said in an e-mail Thursday morning. “He has a passionate desire to serve our city’s children and they are better off because of his efforts.”
Henderson is likely to find a less nurturing presence in the chairman’s seat if, as expected, council member Phil Mendelson (D-At Large) becomes interim leader. Mendelson voted against transfer of the school system to mayoral control in 2007, and has taken a dim view of DCPS’ record on issues such as truancy and financial management. He opposed the $25 million in supplemental funding approved by the council this week to cover cost overruns.
Mendelson called it “bad budgeting, pure and simple.”
The Washington Times
By Deborah Simmons
June 7, 2012
Amid a flurry of legislative activity on Tuesday, approval of a $9.4 billion spending plan for the District’s 2013 fiscal year was an encouraging piece of tax legislation.
Introduced by D.C. Council member Vincent B. Orange, the Public School Teachers Income Exclusion Act proposes granting tax breaks to teachers who work for D.C. public schools and live in the city. The only major caveat appears to be that a teacher must have taught a full academic year to become eligible.
Such a mandate seems reasonable when compared with other D.C. tax breaks, such as the D.C. homestead deduction, which grants property-tax breaks to homeowners who own and reside in homes in the District, and the first-time D.C. homebuyer credit, a federal deduction that mandates new homeowners stay in their homes for five years.
The teachers tax legislation is encouraging for a couple of reasons, chief among them that the tax break likely will mean teachers will be fully invested in the city’s education system and not merely collecting a paycheck to pay union dues.
As things stand now, when most D.C. public school educators and coaches leave our schoolhouses, their paychecks go with them to Maryland and Virginia.
These educators don’t have to worry about whether Jose and Keisha have learned a doggone thing. After all, they aren’t neighbors, and they don’t have to fret about whether their own children will mix with the wrong, uneducated crowd.
Mr. Orange’s legislation is important for another reason, too.
Holier-than-thou types generally don’t like measures such as this, and I’m not referring to truly good Samaritans.
I mean the safety-net advocates who cry a river about lost revenue every time phrases like “tax cut,” “tax credit,” “tax break” or “tax relief” are embedded in a piece of legislation.
It’s OK for poverty pimps to make a name for themselves for the sake of poor people. But ask them to support a measure that gives a break to folks whose income is above the poverty line, and they act as though they are being gagged by a silver spoon engraved with Queen Elizabeth’s family crest.
Take the very liberal D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute (DCFPI) by way of example.
In 2005, when the city first embraced legislation that would grant a tax break for D.C. teachers, DCFPI’s Ed Lazere raised both eyebrows.
First he questioned why nurses, librarians and the like weren’t receiving special treatment, too.
Then he questioned whether pocketbook issues were the real reason more teachers live in other jurisdictions.
Up next?
Why, lost revenue, of course.
“The revenue loss would make it harder to make public investments in things like libraries, roads and parks that enhance the quality of life in the District and are critical to attracting and retaining residents,” Mr. Lazere stated in his 2005 public testimony.
Still later, he played the 1 percent card, saying that he “would hope that tax relief would address the regressive features of our tax system and would target relief to address pressing needs. The District could consider, for example, revising its outdated property tax credit for low-income residents or expanding the D.C. [Earned Income Tax Credit].”
C’mon, man.
Liberals, progressives and socialists want you to think any hardworking family with a six-figure salary ought to pay higher taxes.
Never mind that there’s never a plea for government to cut spending.
Never mind that those families are paying college tuitions; living in nickel-and-dime-‘em D.C.; and have rents, mortgages, car notes and other high cost-of-living rates to pay.
Never mind that teachers who live where they work would add to the D.C. tax rolls in other ways.
Sure, the tax break will cost.
In fact, in 2005, the District’s chief financial officer estimated that a tax break for teachers would have cost an estimated $8.5 million in 2005 and $9.5 million three years later.
The District is hardly flush with cash, but giving schoolteachers a cash incentive to live in the city is a smart approach to bolstering tax rolls — and gives educators a vested interest inside and outside the classroom.
Mailing Archive: